Brood Indicators of Colony Health and Resource Availability

Thursday, 27 March 2025

When inspecting a honey bee colony the presence/absence of brood (eggs, larvae and pupae), and the overall appearance of brood, can tell a beekeeper a lot about their colony’s well-being. It can indicate to a beekeeper how well a colony is developing, the presence and performance of the queen, the availability of resources to the colony, and the presence of various pests and diseases. Read this week’s blog to learn more about how the brood can provide an indication of colony health, and what beekeepers should be looking for when inspecting their brood.

Brood Indicators of Colony Health and Resource Availability

The first thing to recognize when discussing honey bee brood is that the abundance of brood will naturally change with the beekeeping season. Bees can start rearing brood as early as February within Northern climates, and brood rearing will increase throughout March and April. In the Maritimes, some brood is likely to be present in the colony by the time beekeepers can first start to inspect their colonies for the current season. Brood rearing will continue at a steady rate during the months of May to July, and, in a typical season, there will be a dearth period mid-summer which will reduce brood production. Following the usual dearth period (mid-August) the colony will start to rear their winter bees, and will continue to rear brood until October. Keep in mind that the beekeeping season will vary year-to-year depending on the weather, which will have an impact on the timing of brood availability, and should be considered when judging the health of colonies based on brood indicators.

New research demonstrates that a low abundance of brood (based on a brood to bee ratio) can be a strong indicator of if there is low forage availability for the colony1. The study shows that, during peak brood production, a brood to bee ratio of less than 1 can indicate environmental stress (such as limited forage availability). Bees require pollen for brood rearing. Pollen provides protein, fats, vitamins, minerals and amino acids that brood development requires2. When pollen availability is low in the environment brood production slows down. Not only should a beekeeper look at the abundance of brood, but also the appearance of the brood. Wet brood indicates the larvae are being fed well, and dry brood reflects inadequate nutrition for feeding the larvae (i.e. pollen/protein deficiency).

The presence of drone brood can also tell a beekeeper something about the colony’s well-being. Drones are reared when there is an abundance of resources within the hive. Seeing some drone brood within the colony is a good sign the colony is well nourished. In stressful conditions drone production is the first thing to stop. Keep in mind that a lot of drone brood can indicate the colony has a drone laying queen or a laying worker. 

Brood indicates if a colony is queen right, and if the performance of that queen is good. First, if eggs and young larvae are present within the colony a beekeeper can have confidence that the colony is queen right. Sometimes it is a challenge to find the queen within a colony, and simply looking for eggs can let a beekeeper know she is present. One indication the queen is performing well is the overall brood pattern. Ideally, the brood should be located at the center of the hive, and, on a single frame, food resources should form an arch over the brood3. Additionally, beekeepers should check if the brood pattern is solid (not “spotty” with many empty cells). A spotty brood pattern may indicate a poor performing queen, and may also be a sign of various brood diseases.

Good arching brood pattern (©ATTTA 2024).

Beekeepers inspect brood to look for signs of diseases. There are several brood disease beekeepers should be aware of and inspect for throughout the season. The first one to mention is European foulbrood (EFB). EFB appears in weak colonies or during times of stress. Typical signs of EFB include: larvae are twisted/coiled within the cell, larvae are discoloured (yellow to brown), and the presence of dry dark brown scales on cell walls (scales are easy to remove). The second brood disease to discuss is American foulbrood (AFB), which is a reportable disease. AFB is highly contagious, it is not a stress related disease, and can infect the strongest to the weakest colony in an apiary. The main signs of AFB to look for include: scales that adhere tightly to the base of the cell, perforated holes within the brood cappings, brood that has a sunken and greasy appearance, and brown coloured larva and pupa. In most cases, AFB can be reliably distinguished from other honey bee brood diseases using the “ropiness” test. Finally, Chalkbrood is another brood disease found within Atlantic Canada. Chalkbrood is a common stress-related disease, but usually does not cause significant colony losses. Chalkbrood is easy to identify in a hive. Beekeepers should look for black, grey or white mummies on the bottom board, in cells, or just outside the hive entrance.

Overall, inspecting brood provides a lot of information to a beekeeper. Beekeepers should regularly inspect the abundance, stage, caste, and appearance of brood to help determine the overall health of a colony. To learn more about colony health and brood production read future blogs from ATTTA.

Connecting with ATTTA Specialists

If you’d like to connect with ATTTA specialists or learn more about our program, you can:

visit our website at https://www.perennia.ca/portfolio-items/honey-bees/

Email attta@perennia.ca

References
  1. Groeneveld, J., Odemer, R. and Requier, F., 2024. Brood indicators are an early warning signal of honey bee colony loss—a simulation-based study. Plos one, 19(5), p.e0302907.
  2. Groot, A.D., 1952. Amino acid requirements for growth of the honeybee (Apis mellifica L.). Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 8(5), pp.192-194.
  3. Camazine, S., 1991. Self-organizing pattern formation on the combs of honey bee colonies. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 28, pp.61-76. 


Review: Staying Ahead of Varroa Challenges and Strategies – Series 1: Varroa Management Successes and Failures

Thursday, 20 March 2025

On Saturday March 15th there was a international webinar on Varroa mite management. The webinar was organized by the Canadian Honey Council, in collaboration with the Canadian Bee Tech Transfer Programs and with support from Véto-pharma. The first webinar of this series had several guest speakers to discuss topics such as acaricide resistance management, Varroa management programs, and a panel discussion on the various Canadian provinces’ challenges and strategies for managing Varroa. Read this week’s blog to learn the highlights of the event.

Review: Staying Ahead of Varroa Challenges and Strategies – Series 1: Varroa Management Successes and Failures

The webinar “Staying ahead of Varroa: Challenges and Strategies – Series 1: Varroa Management Successes and Failures” took place on Saturday March 15th with over 200 virtual attendees across Canada, and with representation across the globe. This was the first webinar of the series with additional webinars expected in the future. The event was organized by the Canadian Honey Council, in collaboration with the Canadian Bee Tech Transfer Programs and with support from Véto-pharma.

Rod Scarlet (Canadian Honey Council) and Ulkrike Marsky (Véto-pharma) welcomed all attendees and presenters to the event and gave an overview of the webinar’s purpose. The first talk of the event was from Phil Lester (Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand) who discussed integrated resistance management for acaracide use on Varroa mites. He discussed three key principles for integrated resistance management, including: alternating acaracides with different modes of action when providing chemical treatment, reducing the selective advantage of resistant individuals in a population (either increasing the pesticide uptake or suppressing detoxifying enzymes), and complementing chemical treatments with cultural and physical control measures. He also discussed the main two challenges for integrated resistance management, which include: no clear evidence of reduced reproduction of pesticide resistant mites (lack of fitness effects), and the incestuous mating system of Varroa mites which allows for pesticide resistant genetics to be maintained. Another interesting topic that was discussed is that some of the methods of integrated resistance management, such as pesticide rotation, will help slow resistance from occurring, but these practices are far less effective at removing existing pesticide resistance within Varroa mite populations.

The next talk was from Geoff Wilson (Saskatchewan Agriculture’s Provincial Specialist, Apiculture) who discussed Saskatchewan’s bee health program with a focus on Varroa mite management. Overall, Saskatchewan’s beekeeping industry has a focus on consistent and repeated messaging on Varroa mite management. The Saskatchewan government, association, tech transfer program and researchers all work to provide the same message on best practices for monitoring and treating Varroa mites. Geoff discussed the various miticides available to Saskatchewan beekeepers explaining when and how to apply the treatment, emphasizing always to follow the manufacturer instructions, and explaining how various treatments target mites based on the honey bee and mite life cycle.

Staying ahead of Varroa: Challenges and Strategies – Series 1: Varroa Management Successes and Failures

The final talk of the webinar was from Julie Ferland (Quebec Provincial Apiculturist). Julie presented a case study on the management of Varroa mites within a Quebec operation. She also discussed the history of the impact Varroa mites have had on the Canadian beekeeping industry including winter mortality and the overall number of colonies in the industry. Finally, Julie gave an overview on integrated pest management in Quebec discussing best management practices for treating and monitoring colonies

The webinar concluded with a panel discussion on managing Varroa mites within the various Canadian provinces/regions and the panelists consisted of Andrew Byers (Atlantic Tech Transfer Program),Matthew Polinsky (Manitoba Tech Transfer Program), Julie Ferland (Quebec Provincial Apiculturist) and Medhat Nasr (Saskatchewan Tech Transfer Program). The panelist discussed trends in Varroa mite levels within each province/region and spoke to mite treatment options. An important message that came from the panel discussion is the importance of frequent and representative monitoring, and to consider that current established economic thresholds are conservative with lengthening beekeeping season. Beekeepers should now consider the need for chemical treatment if mite levels are at or exceeding 1%.

Thank you to all of the organizers of the first workshop of this series. The ATTTA team will share with the Atlantic industry when future webinars are scheduled.

Connecting with ATTTA Specialists

If you’d like to connect with ATTTA specialists or learn more about our program, you can:

visit our website at https://www.perennia.ca/portfolio-items/honey-bees/

Email attta@perennia.ca